Published on
09/02/2025
Published on
09/02/2025
Author
Camila Heinrich
Author
Camila Heinrich
Category
Leadership & Vision
Category
Leadership & Vision
Resistance to AI in Companies: How Leadership and Professional Identity Define the Success of Digital Transformation
Resistance to AI in Companies: How Leadership and Professional Identity Define the Success of Digital Transformation
The true disruption of artificial intelligence is not in the code. It happens when the future of work becomes uncertain and professionals no longer know if they still have a stage to exercise leadership and relevance. The critical challenge is not technical. It is symbolic: the identity that is lost and must be rebuilt.
The true disruption of artificial intelligence is not in the code. It happens when the future of work becomes uncertain and professionals no longer know if they still have a stage to exercise leadership and relevance. The critical challenge is not technical. It is symbolic: the identity that is lost and must be rebuilt.
Big Idea
True organizational efficiency does not come from across-the-board cost reductions or rushed automation. It requires intelligent orchestration of redesigned processes, disciplined leadership, and the strategic use of data [1][2].
Strategic Conclusion
Mid-sized companies that align people, capital, and technology with their business strategy achieve sustainable productivity, higher operating margins, and resilience in short cycles. Those chasing shortcuts accumulate rework, accelerated errors, and cultural fatigue [3].
Immediate Impact
Leaders who master the fundamentals of operational management with excellence build a precise growth engine, turning efficiency into a sustainable competitive differentiator — not an illusion [6].
Big Idea
True organizational efficiency does not come from across-the-board cost reductions or rushed automation. It requires intelligent orchestration of redesigned processes, disciplined leadership, and the strategic use of data [1][2].
Strategic Conclusion
Mid-sized companies that align people, capital, and technology with their business strategy achieve sustainable productivity, higher operating margins, and resilience in short cycles. Those chasing shortcuts accumulate rework, accelerated errors, and cultural fatigue [3].
Immediate Impact
Leaders who master the fundamentals of operational management with excellence build a precise growth engine, turning efficiency into a sustainable competitive differentiator — not an illusion [6].
In recent years, efficiency has become a buzzword across executive agendas. Yet as multiple studies reveal, many initiatives amount to fragile shortcuts: indiscriminate cost-cutting, automation without redesign, and generic consultancy playbooks.
McKinsey confirms that the biggest barriers to productivity remain the absence of clear metrics, poorly defined roles, and outdated processes [2]. For mid-sized organizations with leaner structures, a lack of discipline in these fundamentals is even more critical.
In recent years, efficiency has become a buzzword across executive agendas. Yet as multiple studies reveal, many initiatives amount to fragile shortcuts: indiscriminate cost-cutting, automation without redesign, and generic consultancy playbooks.
McKinsey confirms that the biggest barriers to productivity remain the absence of clear metrics, poorly defined roles, and outdated processes [2]. For mid-sized organizations with leaner structures, a lack of discipline in these fundamentals is even more critical.
The most dangerous strategic vacuum in companies today is the lack of clarity about recognition criteria in hybrid human–AI roles. Process guardians and crisis solvers lose influence without symbolic substitutes, creating fertile ground for cynicism and passive resistance.
The opportunity lies in transforming this void into a platform for engagement. Organizations that redesign roles and establish symbolic transition rituals convert fear into productive energy.
PwC’s Global AI Jobs Barometer shows that roles most exposed to AI already record higher salary growth when well redesigned [3]. Repositioning human protagonism is not just a cultural decision. It is also a competitive economic strategy.
The most dangerous strategic vacuum in companies today is the lack of clarity about recognition criteria in hybrid human–AI roles. Process guardians and crisis solvers lose influence without symbolic substitutes, creating fertile ground for cynicism and passive resistance.
The opportunity lies in transforming this void into a platform for engagement. Organizations that redesign roles and establish symbolic transition rituals convert fear into productive energy.
PwC’s Global AI Jobs Barometer shows that roles most exposed to AI already record higher salary growth when well redesigned [3]. Repositioning human protagonism is not just a cultural decision. It is also a competitive economic strategy.
Meanwhile, the OECD highlights that SMEs that embrace digital transformation in a structured way become more resilient to economic shocks and can level the competitive playing field against larger players [9]. The question is not if to digitize, but how to digitize without amplifying inefficiencies.
The illusion of efficiency is born from immediacy. Investing in technology without process clarity is like turbocharging a misaligned engine: costs rise, but outcomes fail to materialize.
Obvious but flawed path:
Invest only in technology and technical training, hoping people will adapt by themselves.
Smart path:
Reposition AI adoption as cultural engineering. Redesign roles, update belonging metrics, and open structured conversations around the central question: what remains human here?
The trade-off is clear: rushing for efficiency without investing in identity produces silent sabotage. The cost of inaction is losing competitive advantage to sectors already rewarded for successful transitions [3].
Obvious but flawed path:
Invest only in technology and technical training, hoping people will adapt by themselves.
Smart path:
Reposition AI adoption as cultural engineering. Redesign roles, update belonging metrics, and open structured conversations around the central question: what remains human here?
The trade-off is clear: rushing for efficiency without investing in identity produces silent sabotage. The cost of inaction is losing competitive advantage to sectors already rewarded for successful transitions [3].
A BCG field experiment with 758 consultants showed that access to GPT-4 increased speed and quality for well-defined tasks. But without guidance, participants placed excessive trust in incorrect outputs [5].
The lesson:
AI creates value only when combined with scope definition, human validation, and recognition criteria that reward critical use — not blind adoption.
A BCG field experiment with 758 consultants showed that access to GPT-4 increased speed and quality for well-defined tasks. But without guidance, participants placed excessive trust in incorrect outputs [5].
The lesson:
AI creates value only when combined with scope definition, human validation, and recognition criteria that reward critical use — not blind adoption.
Within the next 48 hours, leaders can:
Conduct structured listening sessions to map employee anxieties and expectations.
Redesign recognition criteria for hybrid human–AI roles.
Install an executive AI committee that tracks human impact alongside efficiency.
Three immediate actions that place identity at the core of digital transformation.
Within the next 48 hours, leaders can:
Conduct structured listening sessions to map employee anxieties and expectations.
Redesign recognition criteria for hybrid human–AI roles.
Install an executive AI committee that tracks human impact alongside efficiency.
Three immediate actions that place identity at the core of digital transformation.
References
[1] Goydan, P., & Kelley, K. (2024). Don’t Wait for a Crisis to Reduce Costs. Harvard Business Review.
[2] Schaefer, E., Wijpkema, J., & Sellschop, R. (2024). Breaking Operational Barriers to Peak Productivity. McKinsey.
[3] McKinsey. (2024). The Future of Operational Excellence.
[4] HBR Editors. (2024). Middle Managers Should Drive Your Business Transformation. Harvard Business Review.
[6] Davenport, T. H., & Bean, R. (2025). Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025. MIT Sloan Management Review.
[9] OECD. (2024a). SME Digitalisation to Manage Shocks and Transitions.
[10] OECD. (2024b). Digital Economy Outlook 2024, Volume 2.
[11] PwC. (2024). Global Workforce Hopes and Fears Survey 2024.
[12] PwC. (2024). 2024 Cloud and AI Business Survey.
[13] EY. (2024). Work Reimagined Survey 2024.
[14] McKinsey Digital. (2024). Rewired in Action: Case Collection. Allianz Direct Case.
References
[1] Goydan, P., & Kelley, K. (2024). Don’t Wait for a Crisis to Reduce Costs. Harvard Business Review.
[2] Schaefer, E., Wijpkema, J., & Sellschop, R. (2024). Breaking Operational Barriers to Peak Productivity. McKinsey.
[3] McKinsey. (2024). The Future of Operational Excellence.
[4] HBR Editors. (2024). Middle Managers Should Drive Your Business Transformation. Harvard Business Review.
[6] Davenport, T. H., & Bean, R. (2025). Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025. MIT Sloan Management Review.
[9] OECD. (2024a). SME Digitalisation to Manage Shocks and Transitions.
[10] OECD. (2024b). Digital Economy Outlook 2024, Volume 2.
[11] PwC. (2024). Global Workforce Hopes and Fears Survey 2024.
[12] PwC. (2024). 2024 Cloud and AI Business Survey.
[13] EY. (2024). Work Reimagined Survey 2024.
[14] McKinsey Digital. (2024). Rewired in Action: Case Collection. Allianz Direct Case.
Did you enjoy reading it? Check out the
Did you enjoy reading it? Check out the
